South Sudan: Mid-term Evaluation of the Project: Reducing Hunger and Malnutrition and Promoting Resilient Food Production in Cueibet County/Gok State


Nov 29, 2019 | Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe
View Original

Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe (DKH) renders humanitarian aid worldwide. In its activities, DKH is committed to the Humanitarian Principles of the Code of Conduct of the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement and of non-governmental aid organizations. In all its actions, DKH is guided by the four humanitarian principles: humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. These principles provide the foundations for DKH’s humanitarian action, and are regarded as essential in order to establish and maintain access to affected people, whether in a natural disaster or a complex emergency, such as armed conflict. DKH is also committed to the Core Humanitarian Standards (CHS) in order to adhere to enhanced accountability protocols.

DKH’s assistance is designed to suit the local conditions and is integrated in the economic, social and political context of a specific country or region. It is adjusted to respond to the needs and the situation of the affected population, respect the dignity of the people, and protect valid laws and traditions. Assistance is provided according to needs, corresponds to local standards and is based on a thorough response analysis. It is DKH’s approach to work through a global network of partner organizations. Wherever possible and required, DKH is accompanying the partners from project design through implementation until final project documentation.

Vétérinaires Sans Frontières (VSF) is an international Non-Governmental Organization, providing humanitarian aid and development assistance to pastoralists and vulnerable communities in areas where livestock is of importance. VSF support is in animal health; livestock related agriculture, marketing, food safety, drought responses and mitigation, capacity development of communities and governmental institutions, peace and conflict resolution with the ultimate aim of food security and strengthened livelihoods of pastoralist communities.

Subject of the evaluation: PROMISE

In South Sudan VSF has been implementing the project Reducing hunger and malnutrition and promoting resilient food production in Cueibet County/Gok State (PROMISE) funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). The implementation of this project started in September 2016 and is scheduled to end in August 2023 (two project phases). The project is being implemented in Cueibet County, Gok (Lakes) state of the Republic of South Sudan in a predominantly agro-pastoral community.

PROMISE supports activities aimed at improving food security and reducing malnutrition within vulnerable populations. It addresses structural issues leading to hunger and malnutrition in a bid to resolve these in the medium or long term, with an emphasis on developing sustainable solutions. PROMISE aims to contribute to this global objective by building capacities of target households in innovative and sustainable agricultural practices as well as strengthened resilience against conflict and climatic risks.

The overall goal (impact level) is to contribute to increased food security, reduced malnutrition and resilient livelihoods for vulnerable households in Lakes/Gok State, South Sudan.

The three specific objectives (outcome level) of the project are:

  1. Acute malnutrition in Cueibet is reduced.
  2. Households have adopted innovative, adaptable and sustainable agricultural and/or livestock production practices which allow them to significantly reduce their average food gap per year.
  3. The livelihoods of the target group are strengthened and more resilient against conflict and climate risks.

A baseline was carried out and completed in December 2016 and project monitoring missions carried out in July 2017 and November 2017. Six semi-annual reports covering the period 01 September 2016 to 30 June 2019 have been submitted to DKH. The end of the first phase of PROMISE was in June 2019, for which matter VSF is seeking to conduct a mid-term evaluation.

Scope, purpose and objectives of the evaluation

Purpose of the evaluation

The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the progress made towards achieving expected outputs and outcomes and identify and document lessons-learned and to make recommendations to improve the project for the implementation of phase 2. The evaluation shall further coagulate the identified issues into actionable elements, aimed at improving the current project status.

Objectives of the evaluation

  1. To appraise and establish the relevance of the project. The evaluation will appraise the appropriateness of project objectives to the problems that it was supposed to address, and to the physical and policy environment within which it operates. This will include an assessment of the quality of project preparation and design – i.e. the logic and completeness of the project planning process, the internal logic and coherence of the project design.
  2. To determine the level of efficiency of the project implementation. Project efficiency will be evaluated by gauging whether the progress made towards achieving the expected results is happening at a reasonable cost – how efficiently means and activities are being converted into outputs.
  3. To determine the effectiveness of the project implementation. The mid-term evaluation will determine the contribution made by project outputs towards achieving the project objectives, and how assumptions have affected project achievements.
  4. The evaluation shall also determine the effectiveness of the employed approaches in addressing the primary challenges affecting the community. The linkage and resultant synergy between these respective components shall be appraised.
  5. To determine the project quality. The evaluation shall appraise PROMISE against desirable project quality factors that include: participation and ownership by beneficiaries; policy conformity; appropriate technology; socio-cultural implications; gender equality & outcomes; environmental protection; local institutional development; and management capacities; and financial and economic viability. Any deviation from initial plans shall be evaluated and accounted for. Achievements made in respect of the exit strategy will be gauged.
  6. To provide actionable, context appropriate and innovative recommendations for project improvement and future programming.
  7. To evaluate the project on quality and accountability using the Core Humanitarian Standards (CHS).
  8. Engage in more explorative study to identify overall outcomes and impact against the backdrop of a “Resilience Framework“ (from the perspectives of capacities of communities) and to identify potential shortcomings in this respect as a crucial basis to improve approaches in the second phase.
  9. Engage communities (focus on school feeding committees and other groups established), in action-research and a visioning exercise that borrows from PVCA (Participatory Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment) and SCLR (Supporting Community-Led Response). Identify potential to enhance resilience of communities to maintain educational outcomes and food security with “own means“ with the support and facilitation of the project for the next five years and without upon exit (based on a “Resilience“/LRRD framework).

Evaluation type

This is a mid-term evaluation to assess the progress made by the project towards achieving planned activities and results as set out in the project design. It aims at capturing the progress attained towards addressing the project objectives.

Scope of the evaluation

The mid-term review period will focus on the past 34 months of project implementation from September 2016 to June 2019 in the targeted project areas in Cueibet County. The evaluation will cover in detail programming quality as well as protection and equality topics.

Target audience

  1. BMZ, Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe and Bread for the World: The mid-term evaluation shall provide the donor BMZ and Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe with information on how the project is performing towards finally contributing to the final objectives of the program and what follow-up actions may be necessary to ensure the desired outcomes and project re-designing to suite the context dynamics.
  2. VSF Germany and partners: The mid-term evaluation shall provide VSF and its partner’s opportunity to critically assess technical arising issues and mechanisms and meticulously focus on the recommendations to improve the pathways and potential of PROMISE to achieve expected outcomes and objectives within the project timeframe.
  3. Beneficiaries and stakeholders: The mid-term evaluation process will accord beneficiaries and stakeholders opportunity to participate in the review process, build the capacity for effective participation in reviews, and enhance ownership and accountability of the implementing partners. The exercise will enable improvement of the relevance of the project to the needs of the beneficiary and priorities of the stakeholders.

Key questions

The evaluation tasks relate directly to the evaluation objectives and should be comprehensively addressed with reference to one another.

The key questions of this evaluation based on the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria are:

Relevance

  1. What is the prevailing project context and its significance to project implementation?
  2. Who are the key actors (stakeholders) in the project? What are their roles and responsibilities and how have they influenced project implementation?
  3. What is the relevance of the project objectives to the beneficiaries, community, governance and policy priorities at project and how has this changed during the life span of the project?

Effectiveness

  1. To what extent is the project meeting its objectives?
  2. To what extent has each of the approaches employed by the project contributed towards achievement of project objectives?
  3. What is the quality of the outputs?
  4. What are the identified and potential barriers to successful delivery of the project?
  5. How have the assumptions made at project design evolved and how have they impacted on the project implementation and progress towards achievement of the objectives?
  6. What are the strengths and successes in project implementation (management, staff, coordination and reporting)?
  7. What are the weaknesses and challenges in project implementation (management, staff capacity, coordination and reporting)?
  8. How has the project responded to each of the quality parameters listed under 3.2 (e) above?

Efficiency

  1. What is the level of cost-effectiveness in the accomplishment of the outputs completed so far or in the process of completion?
  2. Were objectives achieved on time?

Impact

  1. To what extent is it likely that the results of the project in terms of the project objectives (outcome level) contributed or will contribute to the achievement of the overall goal of the project (impact level)?
  2. Are there other unintended positive and/or negative changes which have occurred by implementing the project?
  3. How effective has the project been in delivering a gender impact and what unutilised potentials can be identified?

Sustainability

  1. Has the project contributed to enhanced community resilience, and which steps could contribute to this even further?
  2. What is the degree of soundness and feasibility of the project’s exit strategy and to what extent has it been implemented?
  3. What is the level of overall viability of the expected outcomes and signs of sustainability of the same?

Evaluation design and methods

It is a requirement that the evaluation standards of the German Evaluation Society (DeGEval) and the principles and standards of the OECD/DAC for a participatory, credible, gender-sensitive and fair evaluation will be observed.

The methodology proposed by the consultant(s) should include a mix of quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The chosen methods shall be inclusive and respect the social and cultural context of the target groups. The desired methodology is participatory and all the key stakeholders in the program including target beneficiaries, County Agriculture and County Livestock Department staff, will be considered to be part of the mid-term evaluation process. The evaluation will be based on the findings and factual statements identified from review of relevant documents including the project document, Annual Project Reports (APR), Project Implementation Reports (PIR), in addition to the technical reports produced by the project.

The anticipated benefit of a participatory and stakeholder-centred approach is the empowering that the process will impart to those service providers and the beneficiaries/stakeholders who will participate in the exercise. Focus group discussions, key informant interviews, site visits, etc. are proposed amongst the methods to be used for the review. The consultant will provide leadership and bear responsibility for the process, the findings, the comments and the content of the final document. VSF will be responsible for organizing the locations for conducting interviews, household questionnaire and/or focus group discussions in the respective payams of operation whilst the consultant will review and finalize the tools in conjunction with VSF programming team. Participation of stakeholders in the evaluation should be maintained at all the times, reflecting opinions, expectations and vision about the contribution of the project towards the achievement of its objectives.

The consultant should generate a sampling strategy upon giving appropriate justification which will then be reviewed by VSF and DKH program team before being adopted.

Expected products

Inception report

The inception report shall provide a detailed description of the methodology to answer the evaluation questions as well as the proposed source of information and data collection procedure. The inception report shall outline the contents of all the deliverables. The inception report shall be written in English and should not exceed 15 pages and must be accepted by DKH and VSF.

Draft evaluation report

The consultancy team will develop a draft evaluation report for review by the PROMISE program personnel and partners. The final report shall be validated by stakeholders in Berlin and via Skype as may be feasible. The draft report will adopt the format of the final report as presented below under the final report. Generally, the report will include the executive summary, intervention description, evaluation purpose, evaluation methodology, findings and conclusions (answers to the evaluation questions), recommendations and annexes (list of people interviewed, key documents consulted, data collection instruments, ToR, etc.).

Final evaluation report

The evaluation team shall endeavour to develop the final report and present the output in an electronic format to DKH and VSF for final approval and adoption. The final report (Word, Excel files to be put in PDF as well) will be submitted according to the evaluation timeline. The final report shall be written in English and should not exceed 40 pages plus annexes. A sample structure for the evaluation report can be downloaded here.

The final report will be accompanied by the following deliverables:

  • A 2-page evaluation fact sheet and soft copy of dataset. This is to include relevant findings from the evaluation, key points and recommendations.
  • An Indicator Summary Sheet, giving status of all indicators measured in the questionnaire compared against baseline values.
  • Learning dossier – lessons learnt by the entire evaluation team shall be documented and shared with the project team and Programs Office Juba so that they may be taken into consideration for future studies. The documentation of these lessons will be vital for reflection, growth and continued improvement.

Short anonymous summary of the evaluation

Between 7,000 and 10,000 characters (with spaces) for the homepage of Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe and/or Bread for the World.

  1. Process of the evaluation/time frame
  2. 20 November 2019 Expression of interest plus questions
  3. 25 November 2019 Circulation of responses to questions raised by interested parties
  4. 11 December 2019 Submission of offers
  5. 18 December 2019 Selection of evaluation team
  6. 20 January 2020 Concluding the contract(s)
  7. End of January 2020 Kick-off meeting (tentatively via Skype)
  8. February 2020 Inception report
  9. March 2020 Data collection and analysis
  10. Middle of April 2020 Draft version of the evaluation report
  11. Beginning of May 2020 Validation of report (Berlin & via Skype)
  12. End of May 2020 Final version of the evaluation report

Key qualifications of the evaluators

The evaluation team should be composed of one consultant with international work experience and at least one local consultant.

The evaluation team shall compose of members with a comprehensive mix of competencies in agro-pastoral production and market systems and evaluation methods (quantitative and qualitative methods). These will be complemented with at least five years’ experience in related programming and program research. Extensive experience in the specific fields in the Horn of Africa and South Sudan in particular will be required. Excellent communication skills as well as demonstrated writing and presentation skills are requisite.

Management arrangements

The consultant should be informed of some issues, situation and conditions as they are or may arise during the exercise.

  1. Contractual matters: The evaluation will be financed by two different funds. The Protestant Agency for Diakonie and Development (Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe/ Bread for the World) will conclude a contract with the international consultant. The local consultant(s) will get a separate contract by the partner organization. The financial offer should contain two separate budgets: one for the international consultant and another for the local consultant(s). However, the technical offer should contain an evaluation team and an overall approach.
  2. Travel: All international flights land in Juba, it is not possible to fly to Rumbek and onwards to Cueibet on the same day. Rumbek flights are only during week days. The consultant should take into consideration this challenge that should not lead to cancellation of the exercise. VSF will cover the cost of all internal flights and transport.
  3. Accommodation: Consultants will be housed in hotels in Juba and Rumbek whilst in Cueibet they will be housed at the organizations compound lodgings. However, electricity for powering laptops is not guaranteed at all times. Internet access will be available at VSF offices, but may not be available in the hotels.
  4. Data entry may not be possible in the field. VSF will not supply data entry clerks or equipment for data entry. Consultants are responsible for all data entry and management. All hard copies of tools will need to be transported by consultants to the place where data entry will be done. All data sets must be provided to VSF in soft copy at the time of submission. They are the property of VSF and the communities from which the data will be collected and may be used for future analysis. Data will in most instances be collected from non-English speakers. However, tools will not be translated into the local language. A way around this matter will be developed in discussion with VSF program staff and the consultant.
  5. Operation arrangement
  • Accommodation and transport will be provided by VSF;
  • Translators, drivers, facilitators, office space, printing of questionnaires, etc. will be provided by VSF;
  • The contact person in South Sudan will be the VSF Country Programs Manager;
  • The focal person in the field will be the Project Manager;
  • Security advisory issues will be provided by VSF;
  • VSF will take care of internal travels but in case of international flights, the consultant will organize and DKH will pay reasonable prices incurred only.

Reference materials: Relevant documents will be available for the secondary information desk study. The consultant will be encouraged to identify any other sources for appropriate additional information that may be required to supplement what is provided by the project. The project team will share the following documents with the consultants for reference:

  • Project Application
  • Cooperation Agreement for PROMISE
  • Cooperation Agreement for complementary projects
  • Baseline report
  • Project log frame
  • Project activity reports
  • Project Interim Reports
  • Sudan Population and Housing Census report 2008
  • National Baseline Household Survey 2009
  • FAO/WFP food security assessment/survey reports
  • IPC reports
  • Humanitarian Response Plan 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
  • Comprehensive Agricultural Master Plan 2018
  • Other reports and documents that may be necessary
Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe (DKH) renders humanitarian aid worldwide. In its activities, DKH is committed to the Humanitarian Principles of the Code of Conduct of the Red Cross and Red Crescent movement and of non-governmental aid organizations. In all its actions, DKH is guided by the four humanitarian principles: humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence. These principles provide the foundations for DKH’s humanitarian action, and are regarded as essential in order to establish and maintain access to affected people, whether in a natural disaster or a complex emergency, such as armed conflict. DKH is also committed to the Core Humanitarian Standards (CHS) in order to adhere to enhanced accountability protocols. DKH’s assistance is designed to suit the local conditions and is integrated in the economic, social and political context of a specific country or region. It is adjusted to respond to the needs and the situation of the affected population, respect the dignity of the people, and protect valid laws and traditions. Assistance is provided according to needs, corresponds to local standards and is based on a thorough response analysis. It is DKH’s approach to work through a global network of partner organizations. Wherever possible and required, DKH is accompanying the partners from project design through implementation until final project documentation. Vétérinaires Sans Frontières (VSF) is an international Non-Governmental Organization, providing humanitarian aid and development assistance to pastoralists and vulnerable communities in areas where livestock is of importance. VSF support is in animal health; livestock related agriculture, marketing, food safety, drought responses and mitigation, capacity development of communities and governmental institutions, peace and conflict resolution with the ultimate aim of food security and strengthened livelihoods of pastoralist communities. Subject of the evaluation:PROMISE In South Sudan VSF has been implementing the project Reducing hunger and malnutrition and promoting resilient food production in Cueibet County/Gok State (PROMISE) funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). The implementation of this project started in September 2016 and is scheduled to end in August 2023 (two project phases). The project is being implemented in Cueibet County, Gok (Lakes) state of the Republic of South Sudan in a predominantly agro-pastoral community. PROMISE supports activities aimed at improving food security and reducing malnutrition within vulnerable populations. It addresses structural issues leading to hunger and malnutrition in a bid to resolve these in the medium or long term, with an emphasis on developing sustainable solutions. PROMISE aims to contribute to this global objective by building capacities of target households in innovative and sustainable agricultural practices as well as strengthened resilience against conflict and climatic risks. The overall goal (impact level) is to contribute to increased food security, reduced malnutrition and resilient livelihoods for vulnerable households in Lakes/Gok State, South Sudan.The three specific objectives (outcome level) of the project are: 1.      Acute malnutrition in Cueibet is reduced.2.      Households have adopted innovative, adaptable and sustainable agricultural and/or livestock production practices which allow them to significantly reduce their average food gap per year.3.      The livelihoods of the target group are strengthened and more resilient against conflict and climate risks. A baseline was carried out and completed in December 2016 and project monitoring missions carried out in July 2017 and November 2017. Six semi-annual reports covering the period 01 September 2016 to 30 June 2019 have been submitted to DKH. The end of the first phase of PROMISE was in June 2019, for which matter VSF is seeking to conduct a mid-term evaluation. Scope, purpose and objectives of the evaluation Purpose of the evaluation The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the progress made towards achieving expected outputs and outcomes and identify and document lessons-learned and to make recommendations to improve the project for the implementation of phase 2. The evaluation shall further coagulate the identified issues into actionable elements, aimed at improving the current project status. Objectives of the evaluation 1.      To appraise and establish the relevance of the project. The evaluation will appraise the appropriateness of project objectives to the problems that it was supposed to address, and to the physical and policy environment within which it operates. This will include an assessment of the quality of project preparation and design – i.e. the logic and completeness of the project planning process, the internal logic and coherence of the project design.2.      To determine the level of efficiency of the project implementation. Project efficiency will be evaluated by gauging whether the progress made towards achieving the expected results is happening at a reasonable cost – how efficiently means and activities are being converted into outputs.3.      To determine the effectiveness of the project implementation. The mid-term evaluation will determine the contribution made by project outputs towards achieving the project objectives, and how assumptions have affected project achievements.4.      The evaluation shall also determine the effectiveness of the employed approaches in addressing the primary challenges affecting the community. The linkage and resultant synergy between these respective components shall be appraised.5.      To determine the project quality. The evaluation shall appraise PROMISE against desirable project quality factors that include: participation and ownership by beneficiaries; policy conformity; appropriate technology; socio-cultural implications; gender equality & outcomes; environmental protection; local institutional development; and management capacities; and financial and economic viability. Any deviation from initial plans shall be evaluated and accounted for. Achievements made in respect of the exit strategy will be gauged.6.      To provide actionable, context appropriate and innovative recommendations for project improvement and future programming.7.      To evaluate the project on quality and accountability using the Core Humanitarian Standards (CHS).8.      Engage in more explorative study to identify overall outcomes and impact against the backdrop of a “Resilience Framework“ (from the perspectives of capacities of communities) and to identify potential shortcomings in this respect as a crucial basis to improve approaches in the second phase.9.      Engage communities (focus on school feeding committees and other groups established), in action-research and a visioning exercise that borrows from PVCA (Participatory Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment) and SCLR (Supporting Community-Led Response). Identify potential to enhance resilience of communities to maintain educational outcomes and food security with “own means“ with the support and facilitation of the project for the next five years and without upon exit (based on a “Resilience“/LRRD framework). Evaluation type This is a mid-term evaluation to assess the progress made by the project towards achieving planned activities and results as set out in the project design. It aims at capturing the progress attained towards addressing the project objectives. Scope of the evaluation The mid-term review period will focus on the past 34 months of project implementation from September 2016 to June 2019 in the targeted project areas in Cueibet County. The evaluation will cover in detail programming quality as well as protection and equality topics. Target audience 1.      BMZ, Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe and Bread for the World: The mid-term evaluation shall provide the donor BMZ and Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe with information on how the project is performing towards finally contributing to the final objectives of the program and what follow-up actions may be necessary to ensure the desired outcomes and project re-designing to suite the context dynamics.2.      VSF Germany and partners: The mid-term evaluation shall provide VSF and its partner’s opportunity to critically assess technical arising issues and mechanisms and meticulously focus on the recommendations to improve the pathways and potential of PROMISE to achieve expected outcomes and objectives within the project timeframe.3.      Beneficiaries and stakeholders: The mid-term evaluation process will accord beneficiaries and stakeholders opportunity to participate in the review process, build the capacity for effective participation in reviews, and enhance ownership and accountability of the implementing partners. The exercise will enable improvement of the relevance of the project to the needs of the beneficiary and priorities of the stakeholders. Key questions The evaluation tasks relate directly to the evaluation objectives and should be comprehensively addressed with reference to one another. The key questions of this evaluation based on the OECD/DAC evaluation criteria are: Relevance 1.      What is the prevailing project context and its significance to project implementation?2.      Who are the key actors (stakeholders) in the project? What are their roles and responsibilities and how have they influenced project implementation?3.      What is the relevance of the project objectives to the beneficiaries, community, governance and policy priorities at project and how has this changed during the life span of the project? Effectiveness 1.      To what extent is the project meeting its objectives?2.      To what extent has each of the approaches employed by the project contributed towards achievement of project objectives?3.      What is the quality of the outputs?4.      What are the identified and potential barriers to successful delivery of the project?5.      How have the assumptions made at project design evolved and how have they impacted on the project implementation and progress towards achievement of the objectives?6.      What are the strengths and successes in project implementation (management, staff, coordination and reporting)?7.      What are the weaknesses and challenges in project implementation (management, staff capacity, coordination and reporting)?8.      How has the project responded to each of the quality parameters listed under 3.2 (e) above? Efficiency 1.      What is the level of cost-effectiveness in the accomplishment of the outputs completed so far or in the process of completion?2.      Were objectives achieved on time? Impact 1.      To what extent is it likely that the results of the project in terms of the project objectives (outcome level) contributed or will contribute to the achievement of the overall goal of the project (impact level)?2.      Are there other unintended positive and/or negative changes which have occurred by implementing the project?3.      How effective has the project been in delivering a gender impact and what unutilised potentials can be identified? Sustainability 1.      Has the project contributed to enhanced community resilience, and which steps could contribute to this even further?2.      What is the degree of soundness and feasibility of the project’s exit strategy and to what extent has it been implemented?3.      What is the level of overall viability of the expected outcomes and signs of sustainability of the same? Evaluation design and methods It is a requirement that the evaluation standards of the German Evaluation Society (DeGEval) and the principles and standards of the OECD/DAC for a participatory, credible, gender-sensitive and fair evaluation will be observed. The methodology proposed by the consultant(s) should include a mix of quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. The chosen methods shall be inclusive and respect the social and cultural context of the target groups. The desired methodology is participatory and all the key stakeholders in the program including target beneficiaries, County Agriculture and County Livestock Department staff, will be considered to be part of the mid-term evaluation process. The evaluation will be based on the findings and factual statements identified from review of relevant documents including the project document, Annual Project Reports (APR), Project Implementation Reports (PIR), in addition to the technical reports produced by the project. The anticipated benefit of a participatory and stakeholder-centred approach is the empowering that the process will impart to those service providers and the beneficiaries/stakeholders who will participate in the exercise. Focus group discussions, key informant interviews, site visits, etc. are proposed amongst the methods to be used for the review. The consultant will provide leadership and bear responsibility for the process, the findings, the comments and the content of the final document. VSF will be responsible for organizing the locations for conducting interviews, household questionnaire and/or focus group discussions in the respective payams of operation whilst the consultant will review and finalize the tools in conjunction with VSF programming team. Participation of stakeholders in the evaluation should be maintained at all the times, reflecting opinions, expectations and vision about the contribution of the project towards the achievement of its objectives. The consultant should generate a sampling strategy upon giving appropriate justification which will then be reviewed by VSF and DKH program team before being adopted. Expected products Inception report The inception report shall provide a detailed description of the methodology to answer the evaluation questions as well as the proposed source of information and data collection procedure. The inception report shall outline the contents of all the deliverables. The inception report shall be written in English and should not exceed 15 pages and must be accepted by DKH and VSF. Draft evaluation report The consultancy team will develop a draft evaluation report for review by the PROMISE program personnel and partners. The final report shall be validated by stakeholders in Berlin and via Skype as may be feasible. The draft report will adopt the format of the final report as presented below under the final report. Generally, the report will include the executive summary, intervention description, evaluation purpose, evaluation methodology, findings and conclusions (answers to the evaluation questions), recommendations and annexes (list of people interviewed, key documents consulted, data collection instruments, ToR, etc.). Final evaluation report The evaluation team shall endeavour to develop the final report and present the output in an electronic format to DKH and VSF for final approval and adoption. The final report (Word, Excel files to be put in PDF as well) will be submitted according to the evaluation timeline. The final report shall be written in English and should not exceed 40 pages plus annexes. A sample structure for the evaluation report can be downloaded here.The final report will be accompanied by the following deliverables:·        A 2-page evaluation fact sheet and soft copy of dataset. This is to include relevant findings from the evaluation, key points and recommendations.·        An Indicator Summary Sheet, giving status of all indicators measured in the questionnaire compared against baseline values.·        Learning dossier – lessons learnt by the entire evaluation team shall be documented and shared with the project team and Programs Office Juba so that they may be taken into consideration for future studies. The documentation of these lessons will be vital for reflection, growth and continued improvement. Short anonymous summary of the evaluation Between 7,000 and 10,000 characters (with spaces) for the homepage of Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe and/or Bread for the World. 1.      Process of the evaluation/time frame2.      20 November 2019 Expression of interest plus questions3.      25 November 2019 Circulation of responses to questions raised by interested parties4.      11 December 2019 Submission of offers5.      18 December 2019 Selection of evaluation team6.      20 January 2020 Concluding the contract(s)7.      End of January 2020 Kick-off meeting (tentatively via Skype)8.      February 2020 Inception report9.      March 2020 Data collection and analysis10.   Middle of April 2020 Draft version of the evaluation report11.   Beginning of May 2020 Validation of report (Berlin & via Skype)12.   End of May 2020 Final version of the evaluation report Key qualifications of the evaluators The evaluation team should be composed of one consultant with international work experience and at least one local consultant. The evaluation team shall compose of members with a comprehensive mix of competencies in agro-pastoral production and market systems and evaluation methods (quantitative and qualitative methods). These will be complemented with at least five years’ experience in related programming and program research. Extensive experience in the specific fields in the Horn of Africa and South Sudan in particular will be required. Excellent communication skills as well as demonstrated writing and presentation skills are requisite. Management arrangements The consultant should be informed of some issues, situation and conditions as they are or may arise during the exercise. 1.      Contractual matters: The evaluation will be financed by two different funds. The Protestant Agency for Diakonie and Development (Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe/ Bread for the World) will conclude a contract with the international consultant. The local consultant(s) will get a separate contract by the partner organization. The financial offer should contain two separate budgets: one for the international consultant and another for the local consultant(s). However, the technical offer should contain an evaluation team and an overall approach.2.      Travel: All international flights land in Juba, it is not possible to fly to Rumbek and onwards to Cueibet on the same day. Rumbek flights are only during week days. The consultant should take into consideration this challenge that should not lead to cancellation of the exercise. VSF will cover the cost of all internal flights and transport.3.      Accommodation: Consultants will be housed in hotels in Juba and Rumbek whilst in Cueibet they will be housed at the organizations compound lodgings. However, electricity for powering laptops is not guaranteed at all times. Internet access will be available at VSF offices, but may not be available in the hotels.4.      Data entry may not be possible in the field. VSF will not supply data entry clerks or equipment for data entry. Consultants are responsible for all data entry and management. All hard copies of tools will need to be transported by consultants to the place where data entry will be done. All data sets must be provided to VSF in soft copy at the time of submission. They are the property of VSF and the communities from which the data will be collected and may be used for future analysis. Data will in most instances be collected from non-English speakers. However, tools will not be translated into the local language. A way around this matter will be developed in discussion with VSF program staff and the consultant.5.      Operation arrangement·        Accommodation and transport will be provided by VSF;·        Translators, drivers, facilitators, office space, printing of questionnaires, etc. will be provided by VSF;·        The contact person in South Sudan will be the VSF Country Programs Manager;·        The focal person in the field will be the Project Manager;·        Security advisory issues will be provided by VSF;·        VSF will take care of internal travels but in case of international flights, the consultant will organize and DKH will pay reasonable prices incurred only. Reference materials: Relevant documents will be available for the secondary information desk study. The consultant will be encouraged to identify any other sources for appropriate additional information that may be required to supplement what is provided by the project. The project team will share the following documents with the consultants for reference:·        Project Application·        Cooperation Agreement for PROMISE·        Cooperation Agreement for complementary projects·        Baseline report·        Project log frame·        Project activity reports·        Project Interim Reports·        Sudan Population and Housing Census report 2008·        National Baseline Household Survey 2009·        FAO/WFP food security assessment/survey reports·        IPC reports·        Humanitarian Response Plan 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020·        Comprehensive Agricultural Master Plan 2018·        Other reports and documents that may be necessaryIraq: National Specialist in Integrated Water Management/Irrigation Job Posting: 06/Nov/2019Closure Date: 04/Dec/2019, 5:59:00 PMOrganizational Unit: FNIRQJob Type: Non-staff opportunitiesType of Requisition: NPP (National Project Personnel)Grade Level: N/APrimary Location: Iraq-ArbilDuration: 12 monthsPost Number: N/A  FAO seeks gender, geographical and linguistic diversity in order to best serve FAO Members in all regions. Qualified female applicants are encouraged to apply. People with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidentiality.   FAO's office for Iraq is responsible for developing, promoting, overseeing and implementing agreed strategies for addressing countrywide food, agriculture and rural development priorities under Iraq CPF 2018-2022.. It develops and maintains relations with the relevant Ministries at country level. The post is located in Erbil (with visits to Baghdad), Iraq.  Reporting Lines  Under the overall supervision of the FAO Representative in Iraq, guidance from the Senior Resilience Team Leader (both in Baghdad), the direct supervision of the International Water Management/ Irrigation Consultant, and in close consultation with relevant colleagues, the National Specialist (Water Management and Irrigation) will assist with the implementation of water management and distribution of water efficient irrigation equipment and training in Nineveh.  Technical Focus   Implementation support and monitoring of project operations in food security, agriculture, rural development, natural resource management and agro-processing, as well as strategic and policy work, with a focus on rehabilitation of water infrastructure, water resources management, irrigation, drainage and farm water management.  Tasks and responsibilities  
  • Assist International Water Management/ Irrigation Consultant and project managers in the FAO-Office with the implementation and management of irrigation-related projects in Iraq; 
  • Maintain good communication with the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), Ministry of Water Resources (MOWR) and related parties to facilitate the implementation of the project activities efficiently;
  • Ensure effective liaising with the relevant government counterparts and other actors like NGOs that are active in the relevant fields and in implementation and supervision of project activities day to day; 
  • Actively participate in the identification of beneficiaries according to project “selection criteria”, verify that all the members of the beneficiaries’ selection committees are involved in the selection process, make sure that beneficiaries list are compiled according to FAO standards and formats, guarantee the identification process is transparent, neutral and fair;
  • Maintain a complete and up-to-date record of inputs delivery and distribution;
  • Assist in the preparation of specifications for the agricultural inputs, supplies and equipment envisaged in the project activities and assist in the work plan and plan of operation preparation;
  • Establish and train Water User Associations, and liaise with MoWR and other stakeholders;
  • Participate in and contribute to training activities;
  • Assist and implement appropriate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms of field activities for the smooth implementation of the project activities including evaluation of the impact of the project intervention and follow-up on the performance of the projects;
  • Visit sites of project implementation sites as required;
  • Prepare a report at the end of the completion of the project on the overall implementation of project/s activities, including constraints, achievements, lessons learned and recommendations for future work;
  • Participate on behalf of FAO to the meeting as appointed by FAOR and International Agronomist Consultant and report the outcome of such meetings with recommendation on actions to be taken;  
  • Carry out any other additional tasks required to ensure the smooth running of the project.
 Minimum Requirements   

 
  • University degree in water resources management, irrigation, agronomy or related disciplines;
  • At least five years professional experience, with specific experience in project implementation and demonstrated professional competence and mastery of subject matter;
  • Working knowledge of English. Limited knowledge of one of the other FAO languages: Chinese, Arabic, Russian, Spanish and/or French. Knowledge of Arabic would be an asset.
  • National of Iraq.
  FAO Core Competencies  
  • Results Focus
  • Teamwork
  • Communication
  • Building Effective Relationships
  • Knowledge Sharing and Continuous Improvement
 Technical/Functional Skills  
  • Ability to operate effectively under pressure, rapidly perform situations assessments and respond quickly and affectedly as required;
  • Possession of a valid driver’s license;
  • Possess computer skills with good working knowledge of database creation, PowerPoint production, word processing & spread sheet applications;
  • Prove of participation in one or more of the following advanced courses; First Aid, Mine Awareness, Defensive Driving, Self Defence, Fire Fighting, Hostage Survival and/or Anti-hijacking measures;
  • Organized, and able to work independently and for long hours (sometimes unscheduled);
  • Excellent communications skill, both orally and in writing; 
  • Ability to work under pressure and to carry out several tasks in a timely fashion and under tight deadlines with minimum supervision;
 Courtesy, tact and ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with people of different national and cultural backgrounds. EarthRights International is a non-governmental, non-profit organization that combines the power of law and the power of people in defense of human rights and the environment, which we define as “earth rights.” A key part of who we are organizationally is our three-pronged approach to making change: training of community and legal activists, strategic legal work in defense of human rights and corporate accountability, and campaigns to promote systemic governmental and corporate policy change.  Our work in Myanmar focuses on climate justice, EarthRights Defenders and corporate accountability. We are now commencing a new project with partners in Myanmar focusing on land, extractives and gender through which EarthRights will be providing legal and technical support to our partners, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and impacted communities. We will also be increasing our focus on climate justice.  Summary Description  Reporting to the Myanmar Deputy Legal Director, the Project Coordinator will provide legal support and will ensure that deliverables for our new project on land, extractives and gender are met in a timely and effective manner. The position will also provide assistance to the work of our Yangon office on climate justice.  This position is based in our Yangon office with regular travel, including to Kachin, Shan and Sagaing.  Roles and Responsibilities  
  • Support the implementation of the agreed project activities in relation to land rights, extractives and gender. Ensure that the project is delivered on time, to agreed budgets and to the highest standards.
  • Develop and maintain relationships and partnerships including with communities, civil society and government actors.
  • Support the collaborative design and delivery of capacity building initiatives that support CSOs and communities affected by development projects including through activities such as training, exchange visits, natural resource mapping, legal awareness raising, participatory research activities, and environmental monitoring.
  • Provide legal advice to CSOs, communities, colleagues and partners or facilitate such advice on the rights and duties set out in Myanmar law and international standards on extractives, land rights, the environment and human rights.
  • Support CSOs and communities to link with and access resource persons and organizations with expertise in the mining sector and on environmental harms and remedies.
  • Research and provide analysis on the legal framework on land rights and extractives in Myanmar and update project team on this.
  • Contribute to the content and design of information, education and communication materials on land rights and extractives.
  • Ensure that project meets donor requirements and assist with reporting to donors, including narrative reporting.
  • Work closely with Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) colleagues and ensure that findings are incorporated into project design and implementation.
  • Contribute to knowledge sharing across the organisation.
  Required Qualifications and Experience  
  • Advanced degree in law preferred.
  • 2-3 years of experience with project management, including design, implementation, monitoring & evaluation and project budgeting.
  • Fluent in Burmese and ability to communicate in English (written and spoken).
  • Strong understanding of Myanmar legal framework and international standards in relation to extractives, land rights, the environment and human rights.
  • Strong analytical skills and ability to convey complex issues in a clear and simple way.
  • Experience working with communities, preferably communities affected by extractive projects or environmental and land rights
  • Experience designing and delivering training to civil society organisations and communities.
  • Ability to build relationships with key partners (CSOs and communities) and other stakeholders (e.g. members of parliament and government).
  • Strong interpersonal skills and an ability to be flexible and sensitive in demanding situations.
  • Ability to organize work effectively as well as develop and deliver on work plans.
  • Adaptable and flexible, with a willingness to travel regularly.
  How to apply:  Interested candidates should email their cover letter describing their interest in the job along with a CV to the following email address apply-sea@earthrights.org by 5 December, 2019. Be sure to use "Project Coordinator - Legal" as your subject line when submitting your application materials  Please note that only shortlisted candidates will be contacted.EarthRights International is an equal opportunity employer that does not discriminate in its hiring practices, and actively encourages people of color, women, people with disabilities, and LGBTQI people to apply.CTG stands for Committed To Good. With an ethical approach at the heart of all that we do, it is a description that makes us proud. Respect for the fundamental human rights of our staff, and those our staff encounter, is a cornerstone of our values. We strive for gender equality, inclusion and diversity, providing fair and equal opportunities for all. We take a zero tolerance approach to corruption and stay true to local labour laws and all local statutory requirements.  In operation since 2006, today we are honoured to serve clients in 15 fragile and conflict-affected states assisting with disaster relief, peace building, humanitarian aid and development programmes through our specialised recruitment, HR management and operational services  Overview:  Somalia’s paradox as a country is that it is becoming increasingly water scarce & economically water dependent. In the north, over 80% of the country’s landmass is classified as Arid & Semi Arid Land (ASAL), making it relatively unproductive for agriculture, with nomadic pastoralism the only potential livelihood option. Somalia’s ASALs house the greatest national proportion of pastoralists in Africa. In the south, the country is considerably more lush with rivers that often flood. The riparian areas are unable to capture & use flood runoff effectively, such as for irrigation.  Water & climate trends show reduced surface water availability, reduced groundwater reserves & increased occurrences of drought & flood events. National Adaptation Program of Action (NAPA) revealed that flash flooding has created significant erosion & loss of fertile topsoil into the sea while extensive dry seasons have adversely impacted food security. In recent years, gully erosion has destroyed important valleys creating deep gorges that often restrict mobility of both pastoralists & their animals. Erosion is a growing problem due to Somalia’s alarming deforestation rate at 4%. The recent drought following consecutive seasons of poor rainfall & low river water levels reduced average harvests by 70%, caused significant livestock deaths, contributed to drought related stress migration.   Issues with water scarcity & flooding are expected to be aggravated by the impacts of climate change, future scenarios project dry periods that are predicted to be less prolonged but more frequent than those that have marked the country over the past decade. Though total annual precipitation is expected to increase, reversing a trend of frequent prolonged droughts that have marked the country over the past decades, it is highly likely that this will be associated with an increased frequency of extreme wet days.  Compounding the economic impacts on agro pastoralism is the lack of basic water governance structures. Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) has been an internationally recognized methodology since 1992 when the Dublin principals were jointly concluded at the international conference on water & environment. These principals emphasize that water management & development should be participatory, including with the involvement of women & that water is an essential & crucial economic good. Developing a national strategic plan for IWRM, which focuses on rainwater harvesting, groundwater & surface water capture was highlighted as an urgent need by the federal govt. of Somalia.    In July 2019, the Prime Minister (PM) decided to develop a strategic plan for water resources development in Somalia. The Ministry of Energy & Water Resources (MoEWR) has been tasked to develop National Water Resources Strategic Plan (A Framework for Action) following an inclusive process & along the principals of IWRM. The Ministry will ensure national ownership as well as inputs from all relevant stakeholders, with the technical, financial & administrative support of our client. in Somalia.  A Team Leader (TL) will work on the development of the strategic plan for a period of 8 months, reporting to our client with day to day guidance from the MoEWR & our client. Details of the assignment are presented in subsequent sections of the TORs Role objectives The scope of the TL’s assignment is to formulate national strategic plan for water resources development in Somalia. While the national strategic plan will be the main objective of the assignment, this will be associated with sub outputs, including: ·        Water resources development roadmap.·        Water resources compact.·        National water forum or dialogue. The objective of the assignment should be achieved following all inclusive process along the principles of IWRM.  Development of Strategic Plan is part of our client / GEF Project titled: “Support for IWRM to ensure water access & disaster reduction for Somalia’s agro pastoralists” The TL, with support of a national team member(s) & relevant govt. & our client staff, will draft the national strategic plan that is cognizant of the context & challenges in Somalia. The specific tasks grouped would include: Literature review & compilation of relevant documentation & holding of national dialogue:  ·        Compile & review publications, independent articles, research studies, UN reports, govt. documents that cover the issues associated with water sector (differentiated by sub sectors for different water uses) in Somalia & the region.·        Review of existing policies, institutions & regulatory frameworks of all relevant sectors (agriculture, livestock, domestic, industry etc.) to:1.      Collect, review & present the chronology of the various policies, legal, institutional & other relevant instruments existing in Somalia.2.      Identify the gaps at the institutional, policy, legal, political & technical levels that emerge as areas requiring specific focus in the national strategic plan.3.      Present the linkages of national strategic plan with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), climate change, cross borders water sharing & the priority areas of national development plan, peace building Initiatives, federal member states development plans, strategic country programs of development / humanitarian organisations, donors.·        Compile & review sectoral policies to reflect a mainstreaming approach for IWRM.·        Compile & review selected water sector policies / strategies from Sub Saharan countries to understand best practices.·        Compile & review all documentation related to international, regional & national financing sources for implementation of the expected priority actions in national strategic plan. ·        Hold a workshop for exchange of ideas, information, experiences & present the analysis from literature review, interaction with key stakeholders, secondary data etc.  Design consultative tools:  ·        Preparation of a semi structured questionnaire to collect firsthand information from the key govt. functionaries dealing with national planning, natural resources management, disaster management, law enforcement, youth, women affairs, human rights, IDP's, external affairs, etc.·        Prepare presentations, facilitation guidelines & other tools for conducting workshops with the key govt. institutions, CSO's, academia, research organizations, representatives of agriculture communities, municipalities, private sector, representatives of pastoral communities, development / humanitarian organisations, donors, organisations working on gender issues & media to collect the evidence on the extent of sensitisation about water issues & prioritization of actions to address the challenges in the sector management.·        Prepare consultation & stakeholders analysis reports & annexures to feed in the national strategic plan.  Analysis of intra / inter member states & neighboring countries water management challenges & options:  ·        Prepare structured questionnaire or other tools to map out the water management & water sharing options for intra / inter member states & neighboring countries.·        Hold meetings with the key decision makers (national, regional & international) to distill out actionable recommendations on water sharing & management.·        Prepare documentation with annexures to feed into the national strategy.   Develop the strategy:  ·        Collate information collected & prepared in the previous tasks.·        Present the information, notes, summaries, data & other information for each chapter of the strategy. ·        Update the draft strategy based on comments provided by the Somali govt. & other stakeholders.   Develop road map:  ·        Based on the strategy developed, identify & collect such strategic activities that are thematically linked & group these together into project proposals. Project proposals are developed into overviews, according to a uniform format, that provides an easy understanding of their focus & linkages. The uniform format can include:1.      Project title.2.      Objectives.3.      Key activities.4.      Expected results.5.      Potential stakeholders to engage in writing, funding & implementing each proposal. ·        Building a road map. Based on the project proposals developed above & ongoing or planned projects, proposals are assessed & mapped in terms of time, space, priority & order of implementation.  Develop a water sector compact:  ·        In close communication with the stakeholders involved in the strategy formulation, in particular the top level decision makers, like govt. ministries, large expert organizations & donor agencies. Develop a short report stating activities & results that all agree should be achieved over a specified period. It is a consensus document, bringing key stakeholders together in taking the national strategic plan to implementation.  National water forum:  ·        In coordination with the Office of the Prime Minister & MoEWR organize a national water forum to present the national strategic plan & associated outputs.  Final product / Deliverables:  The assignment will be monitored & facilitated by the Portfolio Manager – Resilience & Climate Change. The quality of the deliverables mentioned in the next section will be jointly assessed by the Portfolio Manager, our client & Director General, MoEWR. The consultancy fees would be released upon the certification of Portfolio Manager. The payment schedule will be on a monthly basis against following deliverables:  ·        Inception report (month 1).·        Water sector investments mapping & analysis (month 3). ·        Water sector stakeholders analysis report (month 4). ·        Draft national strategic plan (month 5).·        Draft road map (month 6).·        Final national strategic plan & road map (month 7).·        National water forum, water sector compact & water forum report (month 8)  Key competencies  Academic qualifications:   
  • The TL should have PG Degree in Water Resources Management, Development Economics, Environment, Climate Change, Natural Resources Management, Social Sciences, or Engineering. 
  Years of experience:   
  • More than 10 years of professional work matching the TOR.. 
  Experience & skills:   
  • Expertise in analyzing national plans, policies & building cross sectoral linkages for undertaking the task mentioned in the scope of work. 
  • Specialization in analyzing national plans, policies & build cross sectoral linkages for undertaking the task mentioned in the scope of work. 
  • Good communications & presentation skills as well as an excellent English language communication skills (written & spoken) as well as computer literacy. 
  • Ability to analyse the root causes of the issues & come up with an implementable set of interventions. 
  • Past experience of working with multi sectoral teams. 
  • Sensitivity towards the opinions of the stakeholders/team members, gender mainstreaming, possible institutional partners & Somali communities. 
  • Strong presentation, analytical writing & time management skills. 
  • Experience of effective interaction with policy makers, UN agencies, donors, communities, CSO's, private sector etc. 
  • Experience of formulating & analyzing multi dimensional projects. 
  Language requirements:   
  • Strong written & spoken English.
IUCN Regional Office for Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ECARO) is seeking to recruit an experienced and enthusiastic candidate to join the IUCN ECARO team as Nature-based Solutions Senior Project Officer. The successful candidate will work in close cooperation with the IUCN ECARO Director, the IUCN Global Ecosystem Management Programme, and will be responsible for the management of the ADAPT: Nature-based Solutions (NbS) for Resilient Societies in the Western Balkans project. The Senior Nature-based Solutions Project Officer will work closely with several of IUCN’s thematic programmes as part of the Nature-based Solutions Programme Area.  ADAPT is a project funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) that aims to increase ecosystem and community resilience to climate change and environmental degradation in the Western Balkans. The project brings together Western Balkan economies to develop strategies to strengthen knowledge and awareness of nature-based disaster risk reduction solutions as well as capacities to implement such solutions; to enhance the integration of NbS and equitable climate-smart planning into relevant policies; and to increase the implementation of NbS solutions for disaster risk reduction, including through selected pilot sites. The primary task of the Nature-based Solutions Senior Project Officer will be to manage project partnership and coordinate activities to ensure effective project implementation and the delivery of high quality project results. Other tasks will include priority setting for programme development, donor and partner relations, people management and liaison with IUCN Programmes, Members and Commissions.   Job Description  Major Responsibilities  
  • Overall responsibility for programme coordination, project management and reporting;
  • Support development and implementation of the IUCN Nature-based Solutions Programme Area in Eastern Europe, North and Central Asia;
  • Oversee management and implementation of IUCN ECARO’s Nature-based Solutions project activities in the region;
  • Liaise with the IUCN Secretariat, Members, Commissions and partners in identifying priorities and project development opportunities related to Nature-based Solutions;
  • Actively pursue partnerships and promote synergies with thematically-aligned initiatives and projects in the region;
  • Support fundraising efforts and lead the development of high quality projects in coordination with IUCN programmes and partners;
  • Contribute to the institutional leadership of IUCN in further developing and improving the NbS concept as well as its application, leveraging lessons learnt from the ECARO region. 
  Specific Duties  
  • Coordinate the ADAPT: Nature-based Solutions (NbS) for Resilient Societies in the Western Balkans project ensuring that it effectively delivers against the work plan and results framework;
  • Manage the project team, national coordinators and a number of partners and consultants in ensuring coherent and efficient project planning and delivery;
  • Ensure high quality project oversight and coordination, including liaison with the donor and partners, preparation of project work plans, technical and financial reports, and partnership agreements; 
  • Oversee and manage staff within the NbS programme, including preparing Terms of Reference, work plans, and undertaking performance appraisals;  
  • Lead the development of the Nature-based Solutions Programme Area and follow up projects to the ADAPT project; 
  • Lead in identifying partnership and project development opportunities related to the Nature-based Solutions Programme Area; 
  • With support of the communications team, ensure the appropriate communication and visibility of the projects and its results;
  • Keep the IUCN ECARO Director up-to-date on programme and project development opportunities;
  • Liaise with IUCN Members, Commissions, donors and partners on programme formulation and identification of priorities.
  • Represent IUCN ECARO at global, regional and national events;
  • Present the NbS concept and IUCN’s work on NbS in a technically competent and informed manner in various international fora;
  • Carry out other relevant tasks on request and agreement with the line manager.
  The above list contains the main duties and responsibilities for this position. IUCN ECARO staff members are expected to show flexibility and be willing to undertake other tasks that are reasonably allocated to them but which are not part of their regular job description.  Salary  The gross annual salary for this position is 34.680 EUR subject to deductions for social security contributions and health insurance, and before tax.   Requirements 
  • Master’s degree (or higher) in a subject related to the field of environment or engineering;
  • Minimum of 10 years of professional experience in a field related to natural resource management, climate change, or related fields, with at least 5 years in an international setting;
  • Work experience in Eastern Europe, North and Central Asia with particular emphasis on the Western Balkans;
  • Excellent knowledge of global environmental standards and frameworks, e.g. the Paris Agreement, SDGs and Sendai Framework;
  • Good understanding of the IUCN NbS Standard and experience with NbS implementation on the ground;
  • Knowledge of human rights-based approaches;
  • Proven experience in coordination and management of international projects, ability to coordinate multi-disciplinary teams, including governments, experts, civil society and the private sector;
  • Capacity to work effectively under time pressure and during extended hours if required;
  • Willingness to travel within the region, sometimes at short notice;
  • Excellent command of English; knowledge of other languages spoken in the region is an asset;
  • Computer literacy in MS Office packages;
  • Excellent organizational and networking skills, team-oriented attitude and ability to work independently
  Applications   
  • Applicants are requested to apply online through the HR Management System, by opening the vacancy announcement and pressing the "Apply" button.
  • Applicants will be asked to create an account and submit their profile information. Applications will not be accepted after the closing date. The vacancy closes at midnight, Swiss time (GMT+1 / GMT+2 during Daylight Saving Time, DST). Please note that only selected applicants will be personally contacted for interviews.
WASH Coordinator - VenezuelaInternational Medical Corps International Medical Corps is a global humanitarian nonprofit organization dedicated to saving lives and relieving suffering through health care training and relief and development programs.  Established in 1984 by volunteer doctors and nurses, International Medical Corps is a private, voluntary, nonpolitical, nonsectarian organization. Its mission is to improve the quality of life through health interventions and related activities that build local capacity in areas worldwide. By offering training and health care to local populations and medical assistance to people at high risk, and with the flexibility to respond rapidly to emergency situations, International Medical Corps rehabilitates devastated health care systems and helps bring them back to self-reliance.  Program Background  International Medical Corps has appointed a country representative since March 2019 who is actively participating in coordination meetings with working groups to discuss key issues, including health; Nutrition; mental health and psychosocial support; protection; and water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH). International Medical Corps has been a key collaborator in meetings with UN agencies, including the Pan American Health Organization, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the United Nations Children’s Fund, as well as with local organizations and donors.  International Medical Corps has submitted projects to several donors to address critical needs, including: (1) lack of specialized doctors and health personnel; (2) lack of maintenance for medical equipment; (3) lack of medicines and medical supplies; (4) lack of water treatment, food and potable water; (5) lack of medical waste management services; 5) lack of food supplies to address malnutrition; 6) lack of Protection services.Additionally, as of September 3, 2019, International Medical Corps is one of the few international non-governmental organizations registered as a Civil Association non-profit organization in Venezuela and authorized to provide humanitarian services. International Medical Corps continues to work with IFRC, PAHO, UNICEF other international actors, and local non-profit organizations. By launching efforts with local organizations, International Medical Corps will prioritize not only reaching those most in need, but also building the capacity of the local organizations to provide services for the long-term. International Medical Corps has already identified local partners. International Medical Corps has shipped medicines and medical supplies with a value of more than $500,000 to Caracas, with support from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). International Medical Corps provided medications and medical supplies directly to IFRC and Venezuelan Red Cross (VRC), who support 20 inpatient health facilities and 16 outpatient clinics in Caracas. International Medical Corps (IMC) is now coordinating with international and local partners in Venezuela and is prepared to deliver a multi-sectoral response to meet the urgent health, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in health facilities, protection and nutrition needs of families and communities. Activities will focus on providing essential services with a focus on reaching vulnerable populations, including children, pregnant and lactating women, elderly people and service evaluations. International Medical Corps, will target 22 health facilities that provides outpatient services in 11 states and will provide MMU services in 7 states and 117 communities. At the health facility level, services will include provision of pharmaceutical supplies, health and reproductive health services, capacity building, consultations, mental health services, WASH including hygiene promotion, MH, PSS service and last but not least nutrition services. International Medical Corps will work with 2 local partner at health facility level and MMU. These two are FUDEP and Fundación Nativo. As for the Protection / GBV services, IMC will support 3 women centers through partnering with 2 additional local subs – FUNDANA and Fundacion Habla. Job Summary The WASH Coordinator's role is to lead and provide technical support for planning and smooth operation of WASH activities in any defined context. This includes the active involvement in developing and rolling out the country WASH strategy based on the specific context, assessments/needs identified, program implementation of multiple WASH projects and fundraising. In addition, the WASH Coordinator will support with the overall building of capacity of local staff and stakeholders in WASH. Main Responsibilities  To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential function with or without reasonable accommodation. The tasks listed are representative of the nature and level of work assigned and are not necessarily all-inclusive. 
  • The individual will plan and implement WASH projects, foster internal and external networks with stakeholders and donors; provide technical support to the development of funding proposals. The WASH Coordinator will manage, lead and provide direction to the WASH team in line with Country priorities. In addition, where required, the Coordinator will support the program team in obtaining the required government permissions and positively engage with institutional and private donors as well as IMC HQ. Moreover, the Coordinator will ensure project monitoring, regular reviews, preparation of donor reports, capturing learnings and is able to close the project and implement exit plans. 
  Assessment
  • Provide WASH sectoral leadership and technical support to rapid needs assessments in emergency and development contexts and their analysis and ensure their linkage to activity plans and budgets. 
  • Conduct initial joint multi sector rapid assessment to depict the current humanitarian situation in collaboration with other sectoral staff and affected population; translate the needs into priorities and formulate immediate interventions activities and required resources.
  • Assess in-country resources and capacities (human, material and financial) for WASH program roll out as per agreed objectives. In addition, evaluate the strengths/gaps in the capacities. 
 Program Design 
  • Formulate the overall aims and objectives of WASH response program through a clear WASH strategy for senior Country Management.
  • Design an appropriate overall response to the country specific needs, taking into account the needs of the community; the current levels of in country WASH capacity and the overlapping of WASH and other IMC sectors.
  • Select and design from array of appreciate technologies for water systems for the given context, including source selection (ground water, surface water), abstraction, storage, treatment and distribution for new systems and/or the rehabilitation of old Water systems. 
  • Select and design the most appropriate form of sanitation system (to include excreta disposal, vector control, solid waste disposal, drainage) taking full account of local conditions, resources, customs and cultural norms. 
  • Select and design, in collaboration with other actors a suitable hygiene promotion program that suits the local context and would be widely accepted by beneficiaries. 
  • Ensure and advocate/lobby that WASH program design is considering Health, gender, protection, DRR, operation and maintenance and sustainability.
  • Contribute to ensuring that the response is funded through external donors, and manage (HR, admin, implementation) all aspects of WASH interventions.
  • Ensure Sphere standards both qualitative and quantitative are considered through the program cycle and are well documented.
  • Develop concept papers, letters of intent, proposals and budgets related to the above. 
  Management and Implementation 
  • Plan, lead and manage WASH program in a phased and prioritized manner in full consultation and co-ordination with International Medical Corps’ staff and other agencies both governmental and non-governmental. 
  • Work closely with Human Resources team for planning and hiring of the WASH team. 
  • Build the WASH team capacity to respond to the emergency and development phases. 
  • Train and supervise WASH staff and volunteers. This may involve the writing of work schedules, training plans and appraisals.
  • Ensure gender and protection is considered throughout the project cycle with women being enabled to influence decision- making around WASH challenges.
  • Ensure WASH program implantation is linked to health, DRR, gender, child protection and nutrition.
  • Design and develop appropriate supervisory, monitoring and evaluation systems for WASH interventions.
  • Work closely with program support functions (logistics and finance departments) for WASH program supplies and activities planning.
 Information and Co-ordination 
  • Provide regular updates and technical guidance to team on progress, priorities and challenges – verbally and in writing. 
  • Represent International Medical Corps to governmental and non-governmental groups as needed and agreed with the supervisor
  • Represent International Medical Corps in WASH and relevant Cluster activities. 
  • Other duties as assigned. 
   Code of Conduct It is our shared responsibility and obligation to prevent matters involving Sexual Exploitation & Abuse, Trafficking in Persons, Child Safeguarding and any suggested violation to our Code of Conduct, which may involve Conflicts of Interest, Fraud, Corruption or Harassment.  If you see, hear or are made aware of any suggested activities then you have an obligation to report. Qualifications: 
  • Minimum of bachelor's degree in water and sanitation engineering, civil engineering, or relevant technical WASH specialization
 Experience 
  • At least five years of work experience with designing and implementing water and sanitation systems in IDPs, refugee and migrant contexts, maintaining sanitation systems, and implementing hygiene promotion programs, including 2 years in a humanitarian setting; or equivalent combination of education and experience. 
  • Ability and good understanding of WASH sector and its hardware and software components 
  • Demonstrated analytical, motivational, communication, project conceptualization and planning skills;
  • Experience in developing WASH strategy, clear and realistic activity planning; overseeing implementation, tracking the progress, reporting against the agreed indicators and managing project budget 
  • Experience in emergency and early recovery phases, including assessments and the design and delivery of effective water supply and hygiene promotion interventions in humanitarian and development contexts.
  • Experience and understanding of key intuitional donors’ policies, guidelines and strategies e.g. USAid, OFDA, ECHO, DFID and UN
  • Demonstrated experience in WASH proposal development and preparation of internal and donor reports.
 Competencies 
  • Ability to effectively present information (both written and verbally) and respond appropriately to questions from senior managers in the field and HQ, counterparts, senior government
  • Demonstrated knowledge of linking WASH activities with other humanitarian sectors
  • Ability to understand gender related challenges within the beneficiary groups
  • Demonstrated experience of working closely with support functions (finance and logistics) on activity and procurement planning.
 Other 
  • Fluency in English and Spanish written and spoken
 Equal Opportunities International Medical Corps is proud to provide equal employment opportunities to all employees and qualified applicants without regard to race, color, religion, sex , sexual orientation, national or ethnic origin, age, disability or status as a veteran. 

Solidarités International is the lead agency of an IHF WASH in and out of camps consortium funded by OCHA. 6 international partners and 2 national partner working in Iraq. In addition, SI is the co-coordinator of the Sub National WASH cluster in Mosul with PAH (Polish Organization).

Annual budget of the Iraq mission is around 4MUSD (including the IHF’s partners) with currently 2 ongoing projects (IHF until end of June 2020 and CdCS project to provide WASH services to Syrian refugees in KRI until end of April 2020.

In terms of international HR for 2019-2020, the mission should be composed by: 1 CD; 1 Admin Co; 1 RCO; 1 WASH Specialist; 1 Finance Compliance; 1 Field Co Mosul; 1 WASH PM.

In terms of National HR for 2019-2020, the mission should be composed by: the team in Mosul (+/- 17 staff); 5 staff for the CdCS project and 8 national staff based at Erbil coordination office.

About the job

General objectives:

The program manager is in charge of implementing and achieving the objectives defined in the proposals.

He/she is in charge of supervising the operational teams allocated to his/her program.

He/she guarantees the proper execution and the quality of the implemented program and, if applicable, suggests adjustments or developments to ensure its relevance.

Specific stakes and challenges

·          As the project proposes WASH gap filling activities, the coordination and positioning of SI is a prerequisite.·          Be flexible with your team to positively respond to gaps and/or new emergencies (flooding…)

Priorities for the 2/3 first months:

·          Set-up activities·          Ensure a good coordination with UN Agencies (UNICEF, WASH Cluster and UNHCR in charge of all refugee issues in Iraq including KRI) and WASH actors.·          Assess additional needs which could be covered by SI. This includes the positioning of SI as a WASH actor in 2020 in the targeted refugee camps.

Management :

·          PM will work under the direct management of the CD·          PM will manage a team of 5 staffs (additional daily workers increase this number)

Your profile

Education:

·          WASH engineer (diploma)

Experience:

·          A minimum of 3 years of experience with INGO working in the sector of WASH·          Experience in WASH in emergency is a plus·          Middle East experience an added value, specifically with regards to dealing with local authorities·          Comfortable with logistic procedure and budget follow-up

Languages:

·          English written and spoken/Arabic is an asset

Specific skills and experience:

·          Representation, communication and interpersonal skills·          Aptitudes to develop sector strategy in a competitive environment·          Anticipation, decision making and initiative capacities·          Capacity to prioritize and stress management·          Capacity to work in complex and volatile environments

SI will offer you:

A salaried position: starting from 1980 euros gross per month (including 10% annual leave allowance paid monthly) and a monthly per diem of 750 USD a month. Please note that salary is not negotiable with SI.

Vacation: During the assignment, a system of alternation between work and time off is implemented at the rate of on 7 working days every three months. For a one-year assignment, the expatriate will have a 7 working days break at 3/6 and 9 month (with 850 USD allocated by SI). To these break periods, it is necessary to add the granting of 1 additional rest day per month worked (i.e. 12 days in addition for a 1-year contract)

Social and medical cover: Expatriates benefit from an insurance package which reimburses all healthcare expenses (including medical and surgical expenses, dental care and ophthalmological expenses, repatriation) and a welfare system including war risks. Essential vaccination and antimalarial treatment costs are refunded.

For further information about Solidarités International, please consult our website:  http://www.solidarites.org/en/

Security and living conditions

Erbil security situation is stable; however, the situation is prone to changes due to the political situation. Though the living environment in Erbil feels safe, there are still risks, including the risk of car accidents, robbery/theft and sexual harassment (in particular from taxi drivers to female expats). The major risks currently are from ‘wrong time, wrong place’ incidents, such as small arms fire resulting from personal disputes. There is no curfew in Erbil.

Dohuk, Bardarash, Gawilan and Garmawa are locations under the control of KRI forces. The security is stable. No major security issues to mentioned. Erbil and those locations can be reached with a maximum of 2h.

Security in Mosul city is volatile, but relatively stable day-to-day and is a permissible operating environment for NGOs. This security situation can deteriorate rapidly within the city so strong security processes remain in place and the context is constantly monitored. There is a large presence of armed actors who control different areas (various PMU factions, Iraqi Army, Police etc) which remains a risk for power struggles and security incidents.

Key information about living conditions

Good living conditions in Erbil: individual rooms, fully equipped guest house and office, possibility to walk in the neighborhood, lots of restaurant, no curfew. Nevertheless, movements by foot for female staff alone at night are not allowed due to risks of harassment, dedicated transportation means are identified.

To implement this project, SI will open an office/ guest house in Dohuk and the PM will be based there. Living conditions in Dohuk are good. Some International NGOs have office there and there is no specific movement restriction in Dohuk due to security (except north of Dohuk Governorate). It is possible to come back to Erbil during the week end and for ad hoc coordination meeting.

Application process

Does this description fit you? Please send us your CV and Cover letter in English. CV only applications will not be considered.

NB:  The vacancy may close before the deadline. Thank you for your comprehension

Greater Virunga Landscape strategy development consultancy

The World Wildlife Fund network aims to develop several large-scale landscapes in Africa.  One of these is the Greater Virunga Landscape.  On behalf of the Greater Virunga Landscape (GVL) working group, they are advertising a very exciting consultancy opportunity to help support strategy development for the GVL. This will be contracted from WWF-UK but overseen by the GVL working group, which includes representation from the relevant countries as well as WWF-International. 

Introduction

The Greater Virunga Landscape (GVL) is one of the most biodiverse places on Earth. It is an interconnected set of protected areas that contains more terrestrial vertebrate species and more endemic and threatened vertebrate species than any other site in Africa. The landscape’s diverse mosaic of ancient tropical forests, ice-capped mountains, active volcanoes, savannah, swamps and wetlands provide habitats for important populations of African elephant, buffalo, okapi and the largest concentration of hippo globally. It is also the only place on Earth where 20 primate species coexist, including the entirety of the world’s remaining mountain gorilla population. It contains three World Heritage Sites, one Ramsar Site, and one Man and Biosphere Reserve. The GVL also has immense socio-economic value. A large and growing human population depend on the GVL’s rich natural capital, which also contributes significantly to sustainable national and regional economic growth. Forest products are a key income source, supplemented by income from smallscale agriculture and fisheries and increasingly tourism. The GVL’s forested and mountainous nature makes it a transboundary water tower for the entire region, providing millions of people with fresh water for drinking and farming as well as being the highest and most permanent source of the River Nile. Lake George and Lake Edward within GVL are two of Africa’s most productive lakes and form important fisheries as well as being home to very high levels of endemic fish species.Given its high biodiversity value, the GVL is one of WWF’s five priority landscapes in Africa. WWF has been working in the GVL region since 1992 and the International Gorilla Conservation Programme (IGCP; a coalition of WWF and Fauna and Flora International) has been operating in the region since 1979. Building on: (1) WWF’s existing countryfocused activities; (2) IGCP’s experience of transboundary and coalition working; and (3) the political commitment already demonstrated through the Greater Virunga Transboundary Coalition (GVTC), WWF is now making an overt commitment to facilitate bottom-up development of a transboundary landscape GVL initiative that will embrace integrated landscape level approaches and learning so that it adds value to the existing breadth of work that is happening. In doing so, we will ensure that the GVL initiative brings about transformational change and is not just a ‘new wrapper’ for, often siloed, business as usual.There is a strong commitment to designing and implementing the aforementioned GVL strategy through a coalition approach. This means that the conservation vision and required actions within the landscape will be collaboratively developed rather than internally developed and presented to coalition partners. To enable this, substantial investment in engagement with partners outside of WWF and IGCP is expected. Engaging affected rights-holders will be a critical aspect of the strategic development process and WWF and IGCP’s existing strong relationships with these groups will be important in enabling this. WWF has recently strengthened its social safeguards practices by introducing its Environmental and Social Safeguard Framework (ESSF) which will need to be validated with other coalition partners and a jointly agreed version incorporated into defining and designing the GVL strategy.At the same time, there is a need to build momentum about / buy-in to the GVL initiative within the wider WWF network and this requires some indication of strategic direction. With this in mind and to initiate thinking, in March 2019 a one-day WWF / IGCP internal GVL workshop (‘visioning workshop’) was held. Whilst this workshop was framed around initial strategy development steps, it was intended as the start of a conversation which participants acknowledged would require a much greater and more inclusive effort to complete. Following the one-day workshop, a GVL working group was established between a subset of the workshop participants. This working group has written these terms of reference and is driving the full strategy development process.Purpose of consultancyThe purpose of this consultancy is to provide long-term capacity to support the development of a coalition-owned and locally-owned GVL strategy that embraces people-centred, transboundary landscape, and sustainable approaches. The specific objectives of this consultancy (carried out in close collaboration with the GVL working group) are:1.      To undertake anthropological analysis (culture, history, gender dynamics, governance structures. etc.) of priority areas within the GVL.2.      To clarify what coalition, landscape and people-centred approaches means in practical terms for the GVL initiative, and how this influences strategy development processes, particularly in the light of agreed social safeguards.3.      To design and support implementation of a process to ensure that in the defined areas of intervention (provisionally defined by the GVL working group in advance) the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is respected throughout the GVL strategy development process.4.      To map: (a) stakeholders and rights-holders (local people, government officials, (I)NGOs, CSOs, research institutions, etc.); (b) current / past interventions in the GVL; and (c) how the rights of different groups of people may be affected by the planned intervention, and use this information to define levels of/approaches to engagement in this strategy development process.5.      To facilitate workshops to define a transboundary, stakeholder and coalition-owned GVL strategy6.      To identify necessary research/feasibility studies and pilots, that can be fundraised for as appropriate7.      To document (to an agreed template) the resulting GVL strategy and, as necessary, revisit this with stakeholders following the result of the research/feasibility studies and pilots.8.      To make recommendations for the remit of a future WWF GVL coordinator position

Methodology

Contracting arrangements will be with WWF-UK but the appointed consultant will be guided by the GVL working group (which includes representatives from the relevant WWF country offices) and supported operationally by identified focal points in each of the three countries (Uganda, Rwanda, DRC). See the responsibility assignment matrix (RACI) in Annex 1 for further information.It is anticipated that objectives 1, 2 and 4 will be achieved through a combination of desk-based analysis of existing documentation and key informant interviews with WWF / IGCP staff and key external stakeholders. Objective 3 will initially require the consultant to adapt existing FPIC guidance and build the capacity of coalition representatives in the same, and then to provide ongoing support for implementation throughout the strategy development process. With this information, the consultant will work with the GVL working group to refine and implement a methodology to enable a transboundary, stakeholder and coalition-owned strategy development process (objective 5). This will include determining the most efficient and effective means by which to ensure both the integration of thematic areas and embracement of transboundary working. In all cases, it is expected that this phase will involve substantial consultation with WWF / IGCP staff and key external stakeholders. Whilst stakeholder and coalition owned, the process is expected to follow the strategy development steps outlined in the WWF Programme Standards. These, and current progress against them, are outlined in the table below: 
 Current statusNext steps
ScopeGeographic: broad scope defined Thematic: initial thinking but not refined or prioritisedGeographic: Define (1) an objective / systematic process to prioritise within the agreed scope (2) an objective / systematic process to evaluate any proposals for scope expansion during stakeholder engagement Thematic: Revisit with wider stakeholder group
TargetsLight-touch consideration during visioning workshopRevisit with wider stakeholder group
Stakeholder analysis (including power mapping) and engagement planLight-touch mapping during visioning workshop; additional mapping to prioritiseRevisit with GVL working group and then wider stakeholder/community group
Threat analysis / rankingLight-touch analysis during visioning workshopRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
Goal settingDraft vision and impact statementsRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
StrategiesLight-touch consideration during visioning workshopRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
ObjectivesDraft outcome statementsRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
Monitoring planAgree the key indicators for high level goals and outcomesRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
Implementation arrangementsNot definedRevisit with wider stakeholder/community group
  Expected deliverablesThe following deliverables are expected from the consultant:1.      An inception report detailing the consultant’s understanding of the ToRs with the anticipated approach summarised in a budgeted action plan2.      Documented anthropological analysis of priority areas within the GVL3.      Documented explanation of what coalition, landscape and people-centred approaches means in practical terms for the GVL initiative, and how this influences strategy development processes4.      Documented process and capacity building / ongoing support to ensure respect for the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) throughout the GVL strategy development process5.      Documented stakeholder / rights-holder analysis (including power map) and engagement plan6.      Draft methodology to enable a transboundary, stakeholder and coalition-owned strategy development process (to be agreed by the GVL working group before implementation)7.      Facilitation of a transboundary, stakeholder and coalition-owned strategy development process8.      Documented recommendations and additional research/feasibility studies and pilots9.      Documented GVL strategy (covering all strategy steps defined above)10.   Documented recommendations for a future WWF GVL coordinator position, any other key positions identified, and associated governance mechanisms.The format of the strategy document is expected to be no more than 30 pages excluding any annexes using an agreed format.TimeframeGiven the scale of this work and the high level of engagement with partners, it is anticipated that the consultant will provide long-term, albeit not full-time, support over several months. WWF seeks to engage this consultant as soon as possible, ideally with an inception meeting in region in late February 2020.Required skillsTo be considered for this consultancy, individuals / teams are required to demonstrate through their application that they meet the following criteria:·        As a minimum, a Masters degree in a relevant field·        Significant and demonstrable experience in successful strategy development processes, preferably using Open Standards based approaches·        Experience with applying Safeguarding or Human Rights Based Approaches meeting international standards (GEF or UNDP etc.)·        Exemplar facilitation skills, including experience with a wide range of stakeholders·        Previous experience of landscape (ideally transboundary) planning approaches·        Fluency in English and French (required).·        Fluency in Kiswahili (an advantage).·        Familiarity with and knowledge of the region (an advantage).Application arrangementsThose wishing to be considered for this consultancy should submit: a technical proposal, demonstrating understanding and interpretation of the Terms of Reference and providing an indication of the travel that is anticipated in order to execute this consultancy; evidence of past relevant experience, including any testimonials from such work; and financial proposal by email to Cath Lawson (clawson@wwf.org.uk) by 3rd January 2020. Annex 1 - RACI matrix R = Responsible, A = Accountable, C = Consulted, I = Informed
TasksWWF Uganda Country DirectorWWF DRC Country DirectorGVL working groupGVL consultantUganda focal pointDRC focal pointRwanda focal pointIGCP focal point
Budget sign-offAARICCCC
Collation of GIS data  R CCCC
Prioritisation within the agreed geographic scopeAARICCCC
Anthropological analysis of priority areas within the GVLIICRCCCC
Establish landscape level grievance processesAARICCCC
Clarification of coalition, landscape and people-centered approachesAACRIIII
Design process and support implementation of FPIC throughout the GVL strategy development processAACRIIII
Map stakeholders / rights - holders and define levels of engagement  CRCCCC
Design of strategy development processIICRIIII
Implementation of strategy development workshopsIICRRRRR
Documentation of GVL strategyAACR    
Identification of necessary research/feasibility studies and pilots  CRCCCC
Implementation of necessary research/feasibility studies and pilotsAAR RRRR
Flow of information to wider WWF networkRRR IIII
  Mercy Corps is a leading global organization powered by the belief that a better world is possible. In disaster, in hardship, in more than 40 countries around the world, we partner to put bold solutions into action — helping people triumph over adversity and build stronger communities from within. Now, and for the future.Purpose / Project Description:The relationship between climate change, socioeconomic and political variables, and insecurity is complex and context specific. It requires a systems approach to identify the challenges and design effective interventions that can both promote climate change adaptation in fragile and conflict affected settings and address climate related factors that exacerbate drivers of conflict.This is a relatively new and complex area with a wide range of actors developing and testing interventions that may positively contribute to climate adaptation and conflict management, even if their primary purpose is not the conflict-climate nexus per se.  Whilst organisations are making some progress in this area, there has been a limited attempt to compile learning from these often disparate efforts. This project aims to identify and elevate promising practices and collaboratively develop - and secure commitment to - a shared agenda to inform future efforts in terms of research, piloting and scaling of approaches.Consultant Objectives:
  • Ensure project implementation is on time, target and budget.
  • In coordination with Mercy Corps’ technical Environment & Peace and Conflict teams, Identify, build and manage coordination with a wide range of actors developing and testing interventions that may positively contribute to climate adaptation and conflict management.
  • Contributing towards building Mercy Corps’ credibility as a critical influencer in climate adaptation and conflict management, through the compilation and convening of key lessons and actors,  and promising practices
Consultant Activities:In close coordination with Mercy Corps technical leadership, lead the delivery and coordination of a six-month project with activities including: 
  1. Co-design and then lead a consultative review documenting current thinking and evidence base, with a compilation of case studies and promising practices;
  2. Organise and deliver one or more learning forums;
  3. Produce an action agenda, informed by the learning forums, outlining:
    1. Priority research questions for actors in this space over the next five years;
    2. Proposed pilot initiatives;
    3. Tested activities that are ready for scale; and
    4. Potential collaborations and financing opportunities.
  4. Plan and initiate a targeted dissemination and uptake plan of the action agenda.
  5. Author, co-author and/or peer review project knowledge products (e.g., reports, briefs, data products, tools, blog) as needed.
Consultant Deliverables:The Consultant will:
  • Co-design a detailed work plan, coordinate, and lead project activities.
  • Organise and deliver one or more learning forums
  • Produce an action agenda, informed by the learning forums
  • Create a dissemination plan of the action agenda
  • Write at least one knowledge product
  • Support donor reporting requirements
  • Ensure adherence to programme budget
Timeframe / Schedule: 50 days over 6 monthsThe Consultant will report to:Senior Director, Policy and AdvocacyThe Consultant will work closely with:Technical Support Unit (TSU) Peace and Conflict Advisor; TSU Environment Director, Research and Learning Deputy Director, Policy and Advocacy (multiple), Programmes & Strategic Partnerships AdvisorRequired Experience & Skills:The successful candidate will be a self-starter who is also skilled at working across teams to achieve results. S/He will demonstrate excellent analytical skills that include both an attention to detail and an ability to grasp complex theories and conceptual frameworks. S/He will be organised, conscientious and enjoy working collaboratively. S/He will demonstrate effective verbal and written communication and be able to convey research findings and their implications to multiple audiences, including policymakers, practitioners, think tanks and the private sector. 
  • Bachelor’s degree required. M.A, M.S., M.Sc., or equivalent in a field related to sustainable development, climate change, peacebuilding, resilience, or other relevant fields, are preferred.
  • 3-5 years working on issues related to climate and/or conflict that includes:
    • Co-designing qualitative research, conducting interviews and writing research reports for different audiences;
    • Project management, ideally for DFID-funded activities.
  • Experience designing, coordinating and delivering public events, ideally on policy or research topics.
  • Familiarity of organisations, institutional donors and private sector actors active in the climate-conflict space (preferred).
  • Willingness and ability to travel internationally as required.
  • Fluency in English is required, additional languages (french/ spanish) an advantage.
Norwegian Church Aid is a diaconal organization established in Norway to work with people around the world to eradicate poverty and injustice. Their vision is Together for a Just World. The overarching goal for NCA in Somalia is to support development that promotes human dignity for the poor and for vulnerable groups through programmes that create greater participation, equality and protection. NCA provides humanitarian assistance and works for long-term development. To address the root causes of poverty, we advocate for just decisions by public authorities, businesses and religious leaders. The NCA Somalia’s goal and vision as outlined in the 2016-2020 Country Strategy is to contribute to safer and resilient communities where people have participated in their own development for improved health, economic empowerment and secure environment.To achieve this goal, NCA Somalia is focusing on four thematic programmes namely: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Gender Based Violence (GBV), Education for Sustainable Development and Economic Empowerment. NCA has included Peace Building as another thematic programme in the 2020-2024 Country Strategy. In addition, NCA also responds to emergency humanitarian needs and works to strengthen civil society actors. The target geographical areas in Somalia are: Gedo region- Jubbaland State, Lower Shabelle- Southwest State, Banadir Region- Mogadishu, and Puntland State.Background and objectives of the studyThere is a growing awareness of the links between climate change and conflicts. Research, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s, identifies climate change as a driver for conflicts, but there is also an increasing understanding of the possibilities for climate action to contribute to peace building.For members of the ACT Alliance, working in the nexus between humanitarian relief and long-term development, understanding and knowledge about the links between conflicts and climate change is important. First and foremost, to inform policymakers so that they can make informed, targeted and efficient decisions.Norwegian Church Aid (NCA) and DanChurchAid (DCA) together with ACT Alliance and ACT Alliance EU have come together to carry out a global study on climate change, conflict and peace.The overall objective of this initiative is to inform policymakers and the public at large about the possible linkages and effects between climate change, conflict and peace. In the case of Somalia, the specific objectives are as follows:1.      To analyze the potential link between climate change, conflict and peace.2.      To develop evidence-based messages targeting policymakers at national and regional level for action on climate mitigation.3.      To identify potential opportunities for climate action and peacebuilding in Somalia.4.      To recommend strategies and solutions to tackle climate change and conflict and promote peace at national and regional level.5.      To generate knowledge on climate change that is specific to Somalia and can be used in other sectors relevant to NCA Somalia programming. (WASH, Economic Empowerment, Gender Based Violence and Education and Peace Building.)The global study builds on desk review of academic and practitioners’ documents as well as field research in two countries i.e. Mali and Somalia.Scope of the workAgainst this background, NCA Somalia is looking for a local consultant to conduct research in Somalia. The consultancy will be focused on an in-depth analysis of the relationship between climate change and risks and dynamics of conflict in Somalia. Specifically, the analysis will focus on four locations: Banadir Jubbaland, Puntland and Southwest assessing the ramifications of climate change on economic and societal development, as well as on community relations. The field research should consider and build on previous desk and field studies.Research questionsThe overall questions this research seeks to address are as follows:1.      Are people experiencing effects of climate change, and in that case, do they see these effects as a risk for local development, and/or links to conflicts?2.      To what extent are effects of climate change creating tensions and conflict?3.      What are the effects of climate change on water, sanitation and hygiene?4.      What is the impact of climate change in food production systems?5.      What are local communities doing themselves, to reduce/respond to risks related to the effects of climate change, also in relation to conflict and intergroup dynamics?6.      What kind of conflicts exist/effect the local communities, and are any of the conflicts related to climate change?7.      Do local communities receive any assistance (from the government (Federal, State and local authorities), donors and other) to reduce/respond to risks related to the effects of climate change (related to conflict)? And in that case how?8.      What would local communities like to see, in terms of climate action, to reduce the climate change risks – also in relation to conflict – in their communities, and what barriers do they see, for that to happen?9.      Do local communities see conflict as a hinder to reduce the risks related to climate change?10.   What are the government (Federal, State and local authorities), doing themselves, to reduce/respond to risks related to the effects of climate change, also in relation to conflict? Are there any capacity gaps on the side of authorities?11.   What would local authorities like to see, in terms of climate action, to reduce the risks related to climate change (especially related to conflict), and what hinderances do they see, for that to happen? And do they see any possibility for adaptation to promote peace building?The field researcher will be expected to develop specific questions for data collection linked to the above-referred research questions. It is expected that the interview guide will be attached to the inception report prepared by the consultant and submitted to NCA.Questions will be posed, in a conflict and gender sensitive manner, to 1) people who still live in their communities, including community representatives (e.g. elders, religious leaders, indigenous/marginalize group leaders, women leaders, youth leaders etc.), 2) people who have been displaced, and who now are either IDPs or cross-border refugees, 3) local and national authorities, and 4) NGOs and international organizations which are active in the area. 5) If relevant, different ethnical/religious groups should also be approached. In doing this, it will also consider diversity within these populations (ethno-religious, linguistic, etc.).In interviews questions should be phrased differently as respondents may not be aware of words used in the climate debate. Reference to climate related effects in the country, such as recent droughts, could be more relevant to use.List of respondents (direct interviews or focus groups)CategoryPeople who still live in their community·          Puntland: Nugal Region (areas with farmer & pastoralist conflicts); Bari Region (communities affected by drought and conflicts + Coastal towns affected by cyclones, tsunamis, etc)·          Jubbaland: Gedo Region in Dollow and Belet Hawa (communities affected by floods, drought and conflicts)·          South West: Lower Shabelle: Communities affected by drought and conflictPeople who have been displaced·          Banadir Region (Mogadishu): IDP camps with people displaced by drought and conflict·          Puntland: Nugal Region- IDP camps with people displaced by drought and conflicts; Bosaso: influx of IDPs as a result of drought and conflicts·          Jubbaland: Gedo region- IDP Camps with people displaced by drought, floods and conflictLocal and national authorities, formal or informalDistrict Administrators in all regions·          State officials (line ministry and agencies responsible for disaster management)·          Federal officials (line ministries and agencies responsible for disaster management)NGOs and international organizations·          INGOs working on Climate Change issues: World Vision, Arche Nova·          UN agencies working on climate related issues: UNDP, FAO, etc.·          Specialized research agencies like FEWSNET and FSNAU·          Local NGOs/partners working on climate change issues:- KAALO, ASEP, etc.Relevant ethnical/religious groups·          Community/religious leaders·          Women groups·          Youth groups·          Community groups: WASH Committees, farmer groups, fisher groups, pastoralist groups, etc.MethodologyThe consultant is expected to propose an elaborate methodology of which a summarized version should be included in the application proposal. The methodology should be appropriate for the Somalia context and must be developed with do-no-harm principles in mind. Data and information collected in the course of the assignment will be used solely for the purpose of the assignment and handed over to NCA once the assignment has been completed. This will be reviewed and discussed with the contracting authority for approval before proceeding with the field work. Some of the tools should include but will not be limited to: secondary literature review, household survey, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Disaggregation of data (e.g. men, women, children, youth, elderly, people with disability, minority groups etc.) must be outlined in the proposed methodology.Deliverables        I.           A 10-page inception report, containing the detailed methodology, the research protocol and workplan indicating timelines. The report will provide enough details for NCA to assess the soundness of the proposed methodology and overall approach. The inception report will have to be approved by NCA.      II.           All collected data, including household survey datasets, interviews and focus groups summaries or transcripts will be handed over to NCA.     III.           A technical report covering all research questions (max. 40 pages, excluding annexes) that will guide NCA Somalia in programming.    IV.           A 4-5 pages analytical summary report based on the research aligned to the research questions relevant to the global DCA-NCA climate, conflict and peace report (e.g. excluding research questions 3 and 4).      V.           A max. 1.5-page report on the fieldwork experience, reflecting changes to agreed plan, observations, challenges, and comments / recommendations the consultant(s) would like to share.Duration and working daysThe deliverables outlined shall be completed within Max. 40 days of work.Phase 1Desk review, development of tools and inception report (Delivery I)Phase 2Consultative meetings at field level, training of enumerators and pre-testing of toolsPhase 3Data collection in the field including travel daysPhase 4Data analysis and development of draft technical and analytical reports. (Deliveries III and IV)Phase 5Validation of draft reports and presentation of initial findings and recommendation (Deliveries III and IV)Final PhaseSubmission of final reports(Deliveries III, IV, V)Submission of raw data.(Delivery II)Qualifications and skills·          University degree in any field, preferably Social Sciences. Post graduate education is an added advantage and experience in natural science (climate)·          In-depth knowledge and experience on research methods (household survey, key informant interviews and focus group discussions).·          Knowledge and understanding of Somalia context·          Practical knowledge and understanding of peace, conflict and climate change issues.·          Knowledge of NCA thematic programme areas (Peacebuilding, WASH, GBV, Education and Economic Empowerment) would be an asset·          Excellent Analytical, Communication and Report writing skills·          Self-starter with an ability to work with minimal supervision·          Strong interpersonal skills·          Ability to maintain one’s composure while under pressure·          Evidence of use of ethical consideration and methodological measures for conducting research with women, men, boys and girls in sensitive topics.Language: Excellent spoken and written English and Somali