Côte d’Ivoire Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment


Publisher: UNEP

Date: 2015

Topics: Assessment, Conflict Prevention, Programming

Countries: Cote d'Ivoire

View Original

Focusing on critical issues such as forestry, the system of national parks, urban expansion challenges in Abidjan, and the Ebrie Lagoon, this report offers a series of public policy interventions to help reshape the country’s environmental situation. It calls for renewed efforts to halt widespread deforestation and for the protection and management of areas with significant conservation value. It also outlines how investments in ecological restoration can help support the country’s economic recovery. With a young population, relatively low population density and a favourable climate, Cote d’Ivoire has the potential to reverse environmental degradation and emerge as a leader on green economy solutions.

 

The Republic of Cote d’Ivoire is located in West Africa and shares borders with Liberia and Guinea to the west, Ghana to the east, and Mali and Burkina Faso to the north; to the south lies the Atlantic Ocean. The country covers an area of 322,463 km2, of which 318,003 km2 are land and 4,460 km2 water. According to World Bank estimates, Cote d’Ivoire has a population of 20.81 million spread across 31 administrative regions, twelve districts, and two autonomous districts.

 

Cote d’Ivoire gained independence from France in August 1960 and in the two decades that followed, made huge economic progress through growth in the export of various agricultural products, primarily cocoa. When the price of cocoa began to fall in the 1980s, the country fell first into economic decline and then, in the 1990s, into political turmoil. There was a military coup in 1999, and in 2000 conflict became open and widespread. Despite reconciliation efforts on the part of the key political actors, in 2002 a mutiny of disaffected soldiers in Abidjan grew into a full-scale rebellion. The rebels of the Ivory Coast Patriotic Movement (Mouvement patriotique de Cote d’Ivoire) seized control of the north of the country from the national government and from then on Cote d’Ivoire was in practice governed as two administrative units, with a buffer zone (termed the Zone of Confidence) in the middle. Abidjan continued to be the de facto capital of the National Government, while Bouake, just north of the Zone of Confidence was the de facto capital of the forces controlling the country north of the zone.

 

In 2010, after a decade of negotiations, an election was held in which all the major political formations took part and people from all the geographical and social parts of the country voted. The independent election commission of Cote d’Ivoire declared Alassane Ouattara the winner, but the incumbent president, Laurent Gbagbo, did not concede defeat. As a consequence, violence broke out yet again. In April 2011 forces loyal to Alassane Ouattara captured Laurent Gbagbo and in May 2011, Ouattara took up the role of president. The new government of Cote d’Ivoire, which came into power after the 2010 elections, made a formal request to UNEP for a post-crisis environmental assessment (PCEA). In responding to the request, UNEP conducted a desk study and remote sensing analyses and a scope of work was agreed with the Government for field work. Fieldwork for the PCEA was conducted in June and August 2013. A number of national experts joined the field work. Chemical analyses of the samples and further remote-sensing studies were conducted between August and October 2013. During 2014, the draft report was prepared and submitted to the government and external peer reviewers.

 

The report studied the following environmental issues which had direct or indirect linkages with the conflict;

 

  • forests, including national parks and classified forests,
  • environmental degradation of Ebrie Lagoon;
  • environmental issues related to unplanned urban expansion;
  • industrial and artisanal mining and their environmental footprint; and
  • risk of oil spill along the Cote d’Ivoire coastline.

 

In addition, the study also looked at how the institutions overseeing natural resource management and environmental governance were impacted by the conflict.